داستان آبیدیک

home office


فارسی

1 علوم اجتماعی و جامعه شناسی:: وزرات کشور

Thereafter, the Home Office Green Paper (1988: 2) Punishment, Custody and the Community took the view that Rock (1995: 2) subsequently reported on the consequences of this: 'Home Office policy no longer follows once standard processes of informal consultation . . . portions of criminal justice policy making have become somewhat less cohesive, coherent, controlled and centralized as they come under the sway of devolution, "contracting out" and external consultants.' Twenty years later, however, the Home Office (1996: 48) White Paper, Protecting the Public, demonstrated the important changes that had since occurred in conceptualizing dangerousness: 'too often in the past, those who have shown a propensity to commit serious or violent sexual offences have served their sentences and been released only to offend again . . . the government is determined that the public should receive proper protection [from such criminals].' The Home Office (2001: 32) thus recommended the introduction of a new 'special sentence' for dangerous offenders, those who had 'a high risk of committing a further offence that would cause serious harm to the public'. Such offenders would only be released at the discretion of the Parole Board when 'their risks are considered manageable in the community' (Home Office, 2002: 95).

واژگان شبکه مترجمین ایران


معنی‌های پیشنهادی کاربران

نام و نام خانوادگی
شماره تلفن همراه
متن معنی یا پیشنهاد شما
Captcha Code